Who Cites Whom?

The overrepresentation of male-cited sources in the most shared climate change news stories

Authors

  • Asta Zelenkauskaite Mykolas Romeris University, Lithuania https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5762-4605
  • Gintarė Gulevičiūtė Mykolas Romeris University, Lithuania
  • Monika Mačiulienė Mykolas Romeris University, Lithuania
  • Aelita Skaržauskienė Mykolas Romeris University, Lithuania
  • Aistė Diržytė Mykolas Romeris University, Lithuania

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.7146/mk.v41i79.155541

Keywords:

reporter gender, source gender, news sourcing, climate change coverage, Lithuania

Abstract

While journalists work tirelessly to identify relevant, credible, and diverse sources to support the news stories they cover, not everyone is equally heard. This study examines gender gaps in sourcing on the Lithuanian national broadcaster LRT. lt in the most popular news stories that cover climate change. It analyzes national or international coverage, institutional backing, and type of testimony (prestige, expert, lay) by cross-tabulating these results with the gender of the reporter. Results show that sourcing is still predominantly male, with female sources making up only a third. Male journalists largely cite male sources, while females cite both genders. Male sources are mainly prestige testimonies, whereas female sources present lay testimonies. We contextualize this study within the framework of gender mainstreaming efforts, previously advocated for in climate change research.

Author Biographies

Asta Zelenkauskaite, Mykolas Romeris University, Lithuania

Dr. Asta Zelenkauskaite, is a professor of Communication at Drexel University. Her work research is interested in the processeses through which old media and new media shape one another and how information flows in increasingly “mediatized” environments. Her work is interested in societal challenges of information perception and trust. She has extensively published on gender representation in multiple online legacy media contexts. Her work has been published at New Media & Society, Social Media + Society, Journal of Communication, Convergence, First Monday, to mention a few. She is an author of Creating Chaos Online: Disinformation and Subverted Post-Publics, University of Michigan Press. She is affiliated with Science, Technology, and Society and Information Science at Drexel and with Vilnius Tech, Lithuania.

Gintarė Gulevičiūtė, Mykolas Romeris University, Lithuania

Gintarė Gulevičiūtė (gintare.guleviciute@mruni.eu) is a researcher and lecturer at Mykolas Romeris university involved in a number of international research projects. Her areas of interest are digital marketing methods in digital platforms, e-commerce models for emerging markets, analysis of misinformation in online social networks and societal response to fake news together.

Monika Mačiulienė, Mykolas Romeris University, Lithuania

Monika Mačiulienė (maciuliene@mruni.eu) is a senior researcher at Mykolas Romeris University and associate professor and Vilnius Gediminas Technical University. Her research examines emergence of both collective intelligence and misinformation in social networks and their synergies and stakeholder engagement through co-creative measures. M.Mačiulienė actively participates in international conferences, seminars, and scientific exchange programs and published more than 40 research articles individually and in collaboration with international research teams. Currently, she is involved in a number of international scientific projects (e.g. Horizon Europe projects CLIMAS, DIGICHer, MARTINI H2020 projects INCENTIVE and EU-Citizen.Science) focused on synergies between science and the society as a senior researcher.

Aelita Skaržauskienė, Mykolas Romeris University, Lithuania

Aelita Skaržauskienė (aelita@mruni.eu) is a professor at Mykolas Romeris University and chief researcher at Vilnius Gediminas Technical university. Her main research interests are digital co-creation, collective intelligence, decentralized Web and governance. Currently, she is leading the Lithuanian team in Horizon Europe projects CLIMAS and DIGICHer.  Together with her research team, Aelita Skaržauskienė has developed a Collective Intelligence Monitoring Technique for evaluation of networked platforms (www.collective-intelligence.lt/en), in collaboration with the MIT Centre of Collective Intelligence.

Aistė Diržytė, Mykolas Romeris University, Lithuania

Aistė Diržytė (aiste.dirzyte@mruni.eu) is a medical (clinical) psychologist, currently a professor at Vilnius Gediminas Technikos University and Mykolas Romeris University. Aistė is a full member of the American Psychological Association, a member of the International Association of Positive Psychology, a reviewer for the scientific journals Brain Sciences, Journal of Happiness Studies and many others, a reviewer for more than 50 scientific publications, co-author of two scientific studies, 5 textbooks. 

References

Armstrong, C. L. (2004). The influence of reporter gender on source selection in newspaper stories. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 81(1), 139–154. https://doi.org/10.1177/107769900408100110

Arora-Jonsson, S. (2014). Forty years of gender research and environmental policy: Where do we stand? Women's Studies International Forum, 47(part B), 295–308. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wsif.2014.02.009

Atton, C. (2002). News cultures and new social movements: Radical journalism and the mainstream media. Journalism Studies, 3(4), 491–505. https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670022000019209

Atton, C., & Wickenden, E. (2005). Sourcing routines and representation in alternative journalism: A case study approach. Journalism Studies, 6(3), 347–359. https://doi.org/10.1080/14616700500132008

Barel-Ben David, Y., Garty, E. S., & Baram-Tsabari, A. (2020). Can scientists fill the science journalism void? Online public engagement with science stories authored by scientists. PloS One, 15(1), e0222250. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0222250

Berglez, P., & Lidskog, R. (2019). Foreign, domestic, and cultural factors in climate change reporting: Swedish media’s coverage of wildfires in three continents. Environmental Communication, 13(3), 381–394. https://doi.org/10.1080/17524032.2017.1397040

Boyce, T. (2006). Journalism and expertise. Journalism Studies, 7(6), 889–906. https://doi.org/10.1080/14616700600980652

Boykoff, M. T., & Goodman, M. K. (2009). Conspicuous redemption? Reflections on the promises and perils of the ‘celebritization’ of climate change. Geoforum, 40(3), 395–406. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2008.04.006

Brüggemann, M., & Engesser, S. (2017). Beyond false balance: How interpretive journalism shapes media coverage of climate change. Global Environmental Change, 42, 58–67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2016.11.004

Burstin, H. R., & Arora, V. M. (2021). Gender disparities in journal citations—Another metric of inequity in academia. JAMA Network Open, 4(7), e2114787. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.14787

Cann, D. J., & Mohr, P. B. (2001). Journalist and source gender in Australian television news. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 45(1), 162–174. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15506878jobem4501_10

Coddington, M., & Molyneux, L. (2023). Making sources visible: Representation of evidence in news texts, 2007–2019. Journalism Practice, 17(4), 664–682. https://doi.org/10.1080/17512786.2021.1949629

Coleman, R., McCombs, M., Shaw, D., & Weaver, D. (2009). Agenda setting. In K. Wahl-Jorgensen, & T. Hanitzsch (Eds.), The handbook of journalism studies (pp. 167–180). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203877685-20

Davis Kempton, S., & Connolly-Ahern, C. (2022). “Who’s going to be a creep today?” Understanding the social media experiences of women broadcast journalists. Social Media + Society, 8(2). https://doi.org/10.1177/20563051221108410

Desmond, R., & Danilewicz, A. (2010). Women are on, but not in, the news: Gender roles in local television news. Sex Roles, 62, 822–829. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-009-9686-5

Dispensa, J. M., & Brulle, R. J. (2003). Media’s social construction of environmental issues: Focus on global warming – a comparative study. International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy, 23(10), 74–105. https://doi.org/10.1108/01443330310790327

EIGE. (2023). Gender equality index. Retrieved April 31, 2025, from https://eige.europa.eu/gender-equality-index/2023/domain/knowledge/LT

Feldman, L., & Hart, P. S. (2018). Is there any hope? How climate change news imagery and text influence audience emotions and support for climate mitigation policies. Risk Analysis, 38(3), 585–602. https://doi.org/10.1111/risa.12868

Feldman, L., & Hart, P. S. (2021). Upping the ante? The effects of “emergency” and “crisis” framing in climate change news. Climatic Change, 169, Article 10. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-021-03219-5

Fleming, A., Vanclay, F., Hiller, C., & Wilson, S. (2014). Challenging dominant discourses of climate change. Climatic Change, 127, 407–418. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-014-1268-z

Fox, E., & Rau, H. (2017). Disengaging citizens? Climate change communication and public receptivity. Irish Political Studies, 32(2), 224–246. https://doi.org/10.1080/07907184.2017.1301434

Garcia-Perez, M. A., & Nunez-Anton, V. (2003). Cellwise residual analysis in two-way contingency tables. Educational and psychological measurement, 63(5), 825–839. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164403251280

Global Media Monitoring Project. (2021). Who makes the news? Global Media Monitoring Project 2020. https://whomakesthenews.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/GMMP2020.ENG_.FINAL20210713.pdf

Grabe, M. E., Samson, L., Zelenkauskaite, A., & Yegiyan, N. S. (2011). Covering presidential election campaigns: Does reporter gender affect the work lives of correspondents and their reportage? Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 55(3), 285–306. https://doi.org/10.1080/08838151.2011.597470

Greve-Poulsen, K., Larsen, F. K., Pedersen, R. T., & Albæk, E. (2023). No gender bias in audience perceptions of male and female experts in the news: Equally competent and persuasive. The International Journal of Press/Politics, 28(1), 116–137. https://doi.org/10.1177/19401612211025499

Hansen, K. A. (1991). Source diversity and newspaper enterprise journalism. Journalism Quarterly, 68(3), 474–482. https://doi.org/10.1177/107769909106800318

Hemmati, M., & Röhr, U. (2009). Engendering the climate-change negotiations: Experiences, challenges, and steps forward. Gender & Development, 17(1), 19–32. https://doi.org/10.1080/13552070802696870

Hopke, J. E. (2020). Connecting extreme heat events to climate change: Media coverage of heat waves and wildfires. Environmental Communication, 14(4), 492–508. https://doi.org/10.1080/17524032.2019.1687537

Howell, L., & Singer, J. B. (2017). Pushy or a princess? Women experts and British broadcast news. Journalism Practice, 11(9), 1062–1078. https://doi.org/10.1080/17512786.2016.1232173

Hujanen, J., Jangdal, L., Dovbysh, O., Andersen, I. V., Kolbeins, G. H., Lehtisaari, K., & Oivo, T. (2024). Intervening by staying professional: How Nordic environmental journalists make sense of their roles. Nordicom Review, 45(2), 257–276. https://doi.org/10.2478/nor-2024-0022

Hurcombe, E. (2024, September 11). Conceptualising the “newsfluencer”: Intersecting trajectories in online content creation and platformatised journalism. Digital Journalism, 1–12. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2024.2397088

Jančevskaitė, R., & Telešienė, A. (2013). Klimato kaitos diskursas Lietuvos spausdintinėje ir internetinėje žiniasklaidoje. FilosoFija. Sociologija, 2(24), 92–99.

Jürgens, P., Meltzer, C. E., & Scharkow, M. (2022). Age and gender representation on German TV: A longitudinal computational analysis. Computational Communication Research, 4(1), 173–207. https://doi.org/10.5117/CCR2022.1.005.JURG

Kakabadse, N. K., Figueira, C., Nicolopoulou, K., Hong Yang, J., Kakabadse, A. P., & Özbilgin, M. F. (2015). Gender diversity and board performance: Women's experiences and perspectives. Human Resource Management, 54(2), 265–281. https://doi.org/10.1002/hrm.21694

Kažys, J. (2016). The internet search results on the term ‘climate change’ by local Baltic Sea Region languages. Proceedings of Fifth International Conference on Climate Change Adaptation 2016 Challenges and Issues in Adaptation (pp. 23–30).

Kažys, J. (2018). Climate change information on internet by different Baltic Sea Region languages: Risks of disinformation & misinterpretation. Journal of Security and Sustainability Issues, 7, 685–695.

Kurpius, D. D. (2002). Sources and civic journalism: Changing patterns of reporting? Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 79(4), 853–866. https://doi.org/10.1177/107769900207900406

Lieven, A. (2020). Climate change and the nation state: The case for nationalism in a warming world. Oxford University Press.

Malinauskaite, L., Cook, D., Davíðsdóttir, B., Karami, M. P., Koenigk, T., Kruschke, T., Ögmundardóttir, H., & Rasmussen, M. (2022). Connecting the dots: An interdisciplinary perspective on climate change effects on whales and whale watching in Skjalfandi Bay, Iceland. Ocean & Coastal Management, 226, 106274. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2022.106274

Massa, P., & Zelenkauskaite, A. (2014). Gender gap in Wikipedia editing. In P. Fichman, & N. Hara (Eds.), Global Wikipedia: International and cross-cultural issues in online collaboration (pp. 85–104). Rowman & Littlefield.

Mateos de Cabo, R., Gimeno, R., Martínez, M., & López, L. (2014). Perpetuating gender inequality via the internet? An analysis of women’s presence in Spanish online newspapers. Sex Roles, 70, 57–71. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-013-0323-3

Mikalsen, K. K. (2010). Testimony and Kant’s idea of public reason. Res Publica, 16, 23–40. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11158-009-9105-3

Mulupi, D., & Zirugo, D. (2023). Who gets to speak? Sources in Covid-19 news coverage by Kenyan and Zimbabwean press. Feminist Media Studies, 23(7), 3157–3174. https://doi.org/10.1080/14680777.2022.2099927

Nicolaisen, P. B. (2024). Orchestrating the climate choir: The boundaries of scientists’ expertise, the relevance of experiential knowledge, and quality assurance in the public climate debate. Climatic Change, 177, Article 35. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-024-03697-3

Niemi, M. K., & Pitkänen, V. (2017). Gendered use of experts in the media: Analysis of the gender gap in Finnish news journalism. Public Understanding of Science, 26(3), 355–368. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662515614570

North, L. (2016). The gender of “soft” and “hard” news: Female journalists' views on gendered story allocations. Journalism Studies, 17(3), 356–373. https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670X.2014.987551

Pearse, R. (2017). Gender and climate change. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, 8(2), e451. https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.451

Perga, M. E., Sarrasin, O., Steinberger, J., Lane, S. N., & Butera, F. (2023). The climate change research that makes the front page: Is it fit to engage societal action? Global Environmental Change, 80, 102675. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2023.102675

Petersen, A. M., Vincent, E. M., & Westerling, A. L. (2019). Discrepancy in scientific authority and media visibility of climate change scientists and contrarians. Nature Communications, 10, 3502. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-09959-4

Pilibaitytė, V. (2011). Nuclear energy discourses in Lithuania and Belarus. Media Transformations, 5, 66–87.

Rabitz, F., Telešienė, A., & Zolubienė, E. (2021). Topic modelling the news media representation of climate change. Environmental Sociology, 7(3), 214–224. https://doi.org/10.1080/23251042.2020.1866281

Riedl, A. A., Rohrbach, T., & Krakovsky, C. (2024). “I can’t just pull a woman out of a hat”: A mixed-methods study on journalistic drivers of women’s representation in political news. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 101(3), 679–702. https://doi.org/10.1177/10776990211073454

Schäfer, M. S., & Painter, J. (2021). Climate journalism in a changing media ecosystem: Assessing the production of climate change‐related news around the world. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, 12(1), e675. https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.675

Schäfer, M. S., & Schlichting, I. (2016). Media representations of climate change: A meta-analysis of the research field. In U. Olausson, & P. Berglez (Eds.), Media research on climate change: Where have we been and where are we heading? (pp. 14–32). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315415178

Scheufele, D. A. (1999). Framing as a theory of media effects. Journal of Communication, 49(1), 103–122. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1999.tb02784.x

Schmid-Petri, H. (2017). Politicization of science: How climate change skeptics use experts and scientific evidence in their online communication. Climatic Change, 145, 523–537. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-017-2112-z

Schreurs, M. A., & Tiberghien, Y. (2010). European Union leadership in climate change: Mitigation through multilevel reinforcement. In K. Harrison, & L. McIntosh Sundstrom (Eds.), Global commons, domestic decisions: The comparative politics of climate change (pp. 23–66). MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/8406.003.0003

Shine, K. (2021). Gender and sourcing in student journalism from Australia and New Zealand. Australian Journalism Review, 43(2), 227–243. https://doi.org/10.1386/ajr_00047_1

Shine, K. (2022). Willing but wary: Australian women experts’ attitudes to engaging with the news media. Journalism, 23(11), 2364–2379. https://doi.org/10.1177/14648849211007038

Shine, K., Fisher, A. N., Mikołajczak, G., Ryan, M. K., & Monteith, E. A. (2024). Does gender influence media engagement? Attitudes and experiences of Australian media sources. Journalism Practice, 18(5), 822–840. https://doi.org/10.1080/17512786.2024.2441283

Shoemaker, P. J., & Vos, T. (2009). Gatekeeping theory. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203931653

Simanaviciene, Z., Volochovic, A., & Simanavicius, A. (2014). Analysis of energy efficiency improvement and climate change mitigation policy in Lithuania. WIT Transactions on Ecology and the Environment, 186, 739–749. https://doi.org/10.2495/ESUS140661

Singh, D., McDermid, S. P., Cook, B. I., Puma, M. J., Nazarenko, L., & Kelley, M. (2018). Distinct influences of land-cover and land-management on seasonal climate. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 123(21), 12017–12039. https://doi.org/10.1029/2018JD028874

Singh, P., Tabe, T., & Martin, T. (2022). The role of women in community resilience to climate change: A case study of an Indigenous Fijian community. Women's Studies International Forum, 90, 1025–1050. Pergamon.

Strauss, N., Painter, J., Ettinger, J., Doutreix, M. N., Wonneberger, A., & Walton, P. (2024). Reporting on the 2019 European heatwaves and climate change: Journalists' attitudes, motivations and role perceptions. In R. E. Gutsche Jr., & J. Pinto (Eds.), Journalism and reporting synergistic effects of climate change (pp. 226–249). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781032627526

Streimikiene, D., Lekavičius, V., Baležentis, T., Kyriakopoulos, G. L., & Abrhám, J. (2020). Climate change mitigation policies targeting households and addressing energy poverty in European Union. Energies, 13(13), 3389. https://doi.org/10.3390/en13133389

Taboada, M. (2025). Reported speech and gender in the news: Who is quoted, how are they quoted, and why it matters. Discourse & Communication, 19(1), 93–113. https://doi.org/10.1177/17504813241281713

Tannen, D. (Ed.). (1993). Framing in discourse. Oxford University Press.

Telešienė, A. (2009). Klimato kaitos diskursas Lietuvoje: reikšmių konstravimas dienraščiuose. FilosoFija. Sociologija, 20(4), 250–258. https://www.lituanistika.lt/content/21936

Telešienė, A., Rimaitė, A., & Juraitė, K. (2011). Politicized discourses on environmental and technological risks: The case of Lithuania. Socialiniai Mokslai, 4, 20–31. https://doi.org/10.5755/j01.ss.74.4.1032

Thomson, T. J., Phan, A., Holland-Batt, S., Seevinck, J., Miller, E., & Regi, S. (2023). Who or what gets referenced by whom, how often, and in which ways? Exploring journalists’ sourcing practices in the context of aged care coverage. Journalism Practice, 19(4), 822–842. https://doi.org/10.1080/17512786.2023.2215237

UN Women. (2021). Basics of mainstreaming gender into climate change and disaster risk reduction policies. https://wrd.unwomen.org/sites/default/files/2021-11/BASICS~1.PDF

UNESCO. (2021). UNESCO science report: The race against time for smarter development. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000377456

Vernal-Vilicic, T., & Reyes-Betanzo, C. (2024). The visibility of women experts in the Chilean Press During COVID-19. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 10776990241296480. https://doi.org/10.1177/10776990241296480

Wenzel, A. (2020). Community-centered journalism: Engaging people, exploring solutions, and building trust. University of Illinois Press.

Wheatley, D., Ross, K., Carter, C., & Boyle, K. (2024). Gender in/and the news in the UK and Republic of Ireland: Slow but (un)steady progress? Journalism. OnlineFirst. https://doi.org/10.1177/14648849241276836

Wibeck, V. (2014). Enhancing learning, communication and public engagement about climate change – some lessons from recent literature. Environmental Education Research, 20(3), 387–411. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2013.812720

Ytterstad, A., & Bødker, H. (2022). Climate change journalism in Norway—Working with frequency around the “Green Shift”. Journalism studies, 23(11), 1291–1307. https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670X.2022.2084143

Zeldes, G. A., Fico, F., & Diddi, A. (2012). Differences in the way broadcast, cable and public TV reporters used women and non-white sources to cover the 2008 Presidential Race. Mass Communication and Society, 15(6), 831–851. https://doi.org/10.1080/15205436.2012.723278

Zerback, T., & Schneiders, P. (2024). Noticed and appreciated? The role of argument diversity in enhancing news credibility and reader satisfaction. Journalism, 25(12), 2523–2542. https://doi.org/10.1177/14648849231226030

Downloads

Published

2025-11-07

How to Cite

Zelenkauskaite, A., Gulevičiūtė, G., Mačiulienė, M., Skaržauskienė, A., & Diržytė, A. (2025). Who Cites Whom? : The overrepresentation of male-cited sources in the most shared climate change news stories. MedieKultur: Journal of Media and Communication Research, 41(79). https://doi.org/10.7146/mk.v41i79.155541

Issue

Section

Articles: Theme section