Interview with a vampire: Reviewing the field of digital media and technology through the lens of large language models

Authors

  • David Mathieu
  • Susana Tosca

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.7146/mk.v42i80.166255

Abstract

This article reviews the evolution of digital media research from the early 1990s to the present through an experimental interview with large language models. Treating generative AI as a situated, fallible “expert,” it combines exploratory review, qualitative probing, and reflexive analysis to trace conceptual shifts in the field, drawing on the archive of MedieKultur. We examine the evolution of digital media technologies and their uses, from online communities to data and AI, as well as changing research agendas, from early techno-utopianism to platformization. Critical towards the epistemic limits of LLMs, we urge to consider its outputs as prompts for synthesis, interpretation, and critical reflection, rather than as evidences.

References

Abidin, C. (2021). Mapping internet celebrity on TikTok: Exploring attention economies and visibility labours. Cultural Science, 12(1), 77-103. https://doi.org/10.5334/csci.140

Baym, N. (2010). Personal connections in the digital age. Polity.

Bondebjerg, I. (1986). Informationsteknologi, medier og dannelse. Om informatik- og kommunikationsuddannelser på universitetet - en introduktion. MedieKultur: Journal of Media and Communication Research, 2(2), 7-32. https://doi.org/10.7146/mediekultur.v2i2.682

boyd, d. (2008). Why youth (heart) social network sites: The role of networked publics in teenage social life. In D. Buckingham (ed.), Youth, identity, and digital media (pp. 119-142). MIT Press.

boyd, d. (2010). Social network sites as networked publics. In Z. Papacharissi (Ed.), A networked self: Identity,

community, and culture on social network sites (pp. 39-58). Routledge.

https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203876527

Couldry, N., & Mejias, U. (2019). The costs of connection: How data is colonizing human life and appropriating

it for capitalism. Stanford University Press.

Delany, P., & Landow, G. P. (1991). Hypertext, hypermedia and literary studies: The state of the art. In P.

Delany, & G. P. Landow (Eds.), Hypermedia and literary studies (pp. 3-50). MIT Press.

Fabricius Jensen, E. (1985). Medieundervisningen i ungdoms- og voksenuddannelserne. MedieKultur, 1(1),

35-48. https://doi.org/10.7146/mediekultur.v1i1.666

Fuchs, C. (2014). Social media: A critical introduction. Sage.

Gillespie, T. (2010). The politics of ‘platforms’. New Media & Society, 12(3), 347-364.

https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444809342738

Gillespie, T. (2018). Custodians of the internet. Yale University Press.

Gotved, S. (1997). Det virtuelle fællesskab - om en nyhedsgruppe på Internet. MedieKultur: Journal of Media and Communication Research, 13(27), 53-60. https://doi.org/10.7146/mediekultur.v13i27.1101

Jarrahi, M. H. (2025). Interviewing AI: Using qualitative methods to explore and capture machines’ characteristics and behaviors. Big Data & Society, 12(3). https://doi.org/10.1177/20539517251381697

Jenkins, H. (2006). Convergence culture: Where old and new media collide. New York University Press.

Kristensen, N. N., Haastrup, H. K., & Holdgaard, N. (2018). Cultural critique: Re-negotiating cultural authority

in digital media culture. MedieKultur: Journal of Media and Communication Research, 34(65), 3-9.

https://doi.org/10.7146/mediekultur.v34i65.111265

Ling, R., & B. Yttri (2002). Hyper-coordination via mobile phones in Norway. In J. E. Katz, & M. A. Aakhus (Eds.), Perpetual contact (pp. 139-169). Cambridge University Press.

Leavy, P. (2016). Fiction as research practice. Routledge.

Mathieu, D., & Jorge, A. (2020). The datafication of media (and) audiences. MedieKultur: Journal of Media and Communication Research, 36(69), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.7146/mediekultur.v36i69.122585

Meuser, M., & Nagel, U. (2009). The expert interview and changes in knowledge production. In A. Bogner, B. Littig, & W. Menz (Eds.), Interviewing experts (pp. 17-42). Palgrave Macmillan.

Moretti, F. (2013) Distant reading. Verso.

Papacharissi, Z. (2015). Affective publics: Sentiment, technology, and politics. Oxford University Press.

Plantin, J.-C., Lagoze, C., Edwards, P., & Sandvig, C. (2018). Infrastructure studies meet platform studies in the age of Google and Facebook. New Media & Society, 20(1), 293-310.

https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444816661553

Rheingold, H. (1993). The virtual community: Finding commection in a computerized world. Addison-Wesley

Longman Publishing.

Silverstone, R., Hirsch, E., & Morley, D. (1992). Information and communication technologies and the moral economy of the household. In R. Silverstone, & E. Hirsch (Eds.), Consuming technologies: Media and information in domestic spaces (pp.115-131). Routledge.

Sørensen, J. K. (2013). PSB goes personal: The failure of personalised PSB web pages. MedieKultur: Journal of

Media and Communication Research, 29(55), 43-71. https://doi.org/10.7146/mediekultur.v29i55.7993

Thorhauge, A. M., & Helles, R. (2013). Technology, power and the political economy of new media.

MedieKultur: Journal of Media and Communication Research, 29(55), 1-2.

https://doi.org/10.7146/mediekultur.v29i55.15547

Turkle, S. (1995). Life on the screen: Identity in the age of the internet. Simon & Schuster.

Van Dijck, J. (2013). The culture of connectivity. Oxford University Press.

Van Dijck, J., Poell, T., & de Waal, M. (2018). The platform society. Oxford University Press.

Published

2026-03-31

How to Cite

Mathieu, D., & Tosca, S. (2026). Interview with a vampire: Reviewing the field of digital media and technology through the lens of large language models. MedieKultur: Journal of Media and Communication Research, 42(80). https://doi.org/10.7146/mk.v42i80.166255

Issue

Section

Articles: Theme section